Bathsheba Spooner: Murder in the Age of Revolution

Jul 1
17 min read

On a bitter March night in 1778, in the small town of Brookfield, Massachusetts, Joshua Spooner left a tavern for the short walk home. He never made it. Somewhere along that snowy path, he was ambushed, beaten, and dumped headfirst into his own well. By morning, the quiet rhythms of rural life had been shattered—and the investigation would soon reveal a conspiracy so sensational that newspapers called it “the most extraordinary crime ever perpetrated in New England.”

“Bathsheba Spooner’s crime began in a farmhouse kitchen and ended on a public scaffold, but the real story lives in the space between: where a Loyalist’s daughter became the young republic’s example.”

The Loyalist’s daughter in a Patriot world

Bathsheba Ruggles was born in 1746 into privilege. Her father, Brigadier General Timothy Ruggles, was a towering figure in Massachusetts: a veteran of the French and Indian War, accomplished lawyer, Speaker of the Massachusetts House, and later president of the Stamp Act Congress. Politically, however, he took a fateful turn. When colonial resistance hardened, Ruggles refused to sign the Stamp Act protests and remained firmly loyal to the Crown. In Revolutionary Massachusetts, that choice marked him as a traitor.

Bathsheba grew up in a world of status and expectation: educated, socially prominent, and accustomed to deference. Her marriage, arranged in the mid‑1760s, bound her to Joshua Spooner, a Boston‑born merchant and landowner who settled with her in Brookfield. On paper, it was a prudent match—general’s daughter to gentleman farmer. In reality, it was a union steeped in resentment.

Accounts from the period describe Joshua as a hard‑drinking, overbearing man. Bathsheba would later confess to an “utter aversion” toward him. Whether her words were self‑serving, accurate, or some mix of both, the marriage produced four children and a household slowly imploding under the strain of personal contempt and political division.

By the time open war erupted in 1775, Bathsheba was a Loyalist’s daughter living in a Patriot county. Her father’s lands were confiscated; his name was spat out in town meetings. While Joshua aligned himself with the Patriot cause, Bathsheba’s sympathies tilted toward the Crown. She was isolated: a woman bound to a man she despised, in a community that viewed her family as enemies of the Revolution.

Enter Ezra Ross: the boy soldier and the forbidden affair

The turning point came not with a gunshot but with a fever.

In the spring of 1777, a teenager named Ezra Ross—about sixteen, from Ipswich or Topsfield—was making his way home from service with the Continental Army. He had been with Washington’s forces in campaigns around New York and New Jersey and, like countless young soldiers, was worn out and ill. Near Brookfield, he collapsed.

He was found and brought to the Spooner home, where Bathsheba took charge of his care. The dynamic is worth pausing over: a lonely, intelligent, thirty‑something woman in a loveless marriage; a teenage soldier, exhausted and malleable, basking in the attention of a woman of higher station. Once Ross recovered, he moved on—only to return later that year and again after the American victory at Saratoga.

On these return visits, neighbors noticed the intimacy between Bathsheba and the young soldier. The two rode together often, and their familiarity raised eyebrows in a culture attuned to propriety. Whether the community suspected the truth or not, the affair had become sexual. Bathsheba became pregnant.

It’s difficult to overstate the danger of that pregnancy. Divorce for women was nearly unattainable. Adultery, if exposed, carried brutal consequences—public whipping and permanent social stigma. Bathsheba, caught between a husband she hated, a lover she idealized, and a public that would shred her reputation, began to look for escape in the most final way possible: the removal of Joshua Spooner.

Her first idea was poison.

Poison, then a plan for murder

According to later testimony, Bathsheba urged Ross to acquire aqua fortis—nitric acid—and pour it into Joshua’s grog. The plan was both crude and telling: it reveals not just a willingness to kill, but also a certain naivete about forensic detection. In an age without modern toxicology, poisoning was a known, feared method of murder, and suspicion often fell quickly on household members.

Ross balked. Poisoning his host’s drink felt too direct, too personal, and he fled the house in fear, returning home to the North Shore. For a time, the plot went dormant.

But war has a way of reshuffling people’s paths. And Bathsheba’s home would soon take in new guests—this time not a Patriot boy soldier but British deserters.

Two British deserters at the door

In late 1777, the remnants of General Burgoyne’s defeated army—the so‑called “Convention Army” of Saratoga—were being marched under guard across Massachusetts. Among them were British regulars Sergeant James Buchanan of the 9th Regiment of Foot, a literate Scotsman in his thirties, and Private William Brooks, a younger soldier with a reputation for misbehavior and impulsiveness.

Somewhere along their route near Worcester, Buchanan and Brooks slipped away. Disarmed and adrift in unfamiliar countryside, they wandered, seeking shelter and any work they could find.

They found it—or thought they did—at the Spooner farm.

While Joshua was away on business, one of the household servants brought the ragged deserters into the kitchen. Bathsheba welcomed them with food, warmth, and sympathetic conversation. Here were soldiers of the very army she privately favored, men whose loyalty matched her father’s. She told them as much, identifying herself as the daughter of a Loyalist general and expressing open disdain for the Patriot cause.

Over the next days, the relationship deepened. One of the deserters, William Brooks, became physically familiar with Bathsheba; witnesses later recalled seeing him with his arms around her waist, his head nestled against her neck. It was not merely a transaction of lodging for labor—it was an entanglement of sex, politics, and desperation.

Bathsheba soon made her proposal. She promised money, clothing, and continued favor if the men would kill her husband.

They agreed.

Fusing conspiracies: Ezra Ross returns

By early 1778, Bathsheba had essentially assembled a murder team: two British deserters hiding in the barn and a teenage Patriot soldier who had once been her lover. Fate—or design—brought Ross back to Brookfield just as the plot matured.

On March 1, 1778, Ross arrived at the Spooner home. Whether he came by chance or at Bathsheba’s summons remains debated, but once present, he was quickly drawn—again—into her orbit. This time, he did not resist.

The plan they settled on was brutally simple: Joshua would be attacked on his way home from a local tavern, killed, and his death passed off as an accident at the well. Bathsheba would play the grieving widow; the men would share his money and clothing and vanish.

Night of blood and snow

That evening, Joshua went to Cooley’s Tavern, a short walk from his home. He drank with friends, smoked, and eventually called for his sleigh. Deciding instead to walk, he set out alone into the cold.

Near his property line, as he passed the family well, he was ambushed.

Brooks, lying in wait, sprang on him. The blow was likely with a club or similar instrument, crushing and incapacitating him. Buchanan and Ross stood by—some accounts say they assisted; others portray them as lookouts. Regardless, the beating was ferocious enough to kill Joshua outright.

The men dragged his body to the open mouth of the well and heaved him in. The plan was to claim that he had risen in the night to draw water, slipped, and fallen. In a household where servants and family moved at odd hours, it was just plausible enough to risk.

Inside the house, Bathsheba burned Joshua’s bloodstained clothing in the kitchen fire, opened the money box, and paid her accomplices. They divided his personal effects—clothes, a watch, shoe buckles—and prepared to flee.

It was here, in the hasty disposal and arrogant assumption of safety, that the conspiracy began to unravel.

Discovery and arrest

Snow is a poor ally to conspirators.

By morning, neighbors had noticed oddities: trampled snowbanks near the well, patches discolored with blood, and Joshua’s hat lying abandoned. When he could not be found, suspicion coalesced around the well. Villagers hauled up the bucket—and found, instead of water, the body of Joshua Spooner.

In short order, the coroner’s inquest determined that Joshua had been beaten, not drowned. The story of a nighttime accident collapsed. Meanwhile, Brooks, Buchanan, and Ross were already on the road toward Worcester, carrying Joshua’s clothes and valuables—and, crucially, his distinctive engraved shoe buckles.

They did not make it far. Local authorities, alerted by news from Brookfield and by the obvious signs of sudden wealth and fine clothing on the deserters, arrested the men. Ross, shaken and inexperienced, confessed quickly. Brooks and Buchanan soon followed.

Back in Brookfield, Bathsheba was taken into custody. The sensational shape of the story—elite woman, teenage lover, British deserters, murdered husband in a well—ensured that by the time she reached Worcester for trial, she was already infamous.

The first capital trial of the new regime

The trial of Bathsheba Ruggles Spooner and her three co‑defendants convened in April 1778 in Worcester. It was one of the first major capital cases in Massachusetts after the Declaration of Independence, and it brought together a cast of Revolutionary‑era heavyweights.

On the bench sat Chief Justice William Cushing, who would later become one of the first justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. The prosecution was led by Robert Treat Paine, a signer of the Declaration. The defense counsel was Levi Lincoln, future Massachusetts attorney general and lieutenant governor.

Lincoln understood the stakes. He noted that this was effectively the new government’s first big test of capital punishment. He implored the jury to set aside political animosities—no small ask in a courtroom where the defendant’s father was one of the colony’s most reviled Loyalists.

The evidence, however, was punishingly strong. The men’s confessions, the physical evidence on their persons, and Bathsheba’s own statements left little room to contest the basic facts:

Joshua Spooner was dead.
He had been beaten and thrown into his well.
Brooks, Buchanan, and Ross had carried out the attack.
Bathsheba had supplied the motive, the money, the domestic access, and the cover story.

Lincoln pivoted to what we would now call a diminished‑capacity or insanity argument. He painted Bathsheba as mentally unstable, pushed beyond endurance by domestic abuse, isolation, and hereditary issues. Some of her relatives later described her as eccentric and erratic, and one daughter would spend years institutionalized with what contemporaries considered “madness.” To modern eyes, there is at least a plausible case that Bathsheba suffered from serious mental illness.

The jury, however, was unmoved. After a trial lasting barely more than a day, all four defendants were convicted. Cushing sentenced them to death by hanging.

Initially, the execution was set for early June. Before the gallows could be erected, Bathsheba raised a final, desperate claim.

“Lawfully begotten”: the pregnancy plea

Bathsheba informed the court and the Governor’s Council that she was pregnant and that “the child I bear was lawfully begotten.” This last phrase is crucial. By asserting lawful conception, she implied that the fetus was Joshua’s, not Ezra Ross’s, and therefore an innocent, legitimate heir who should not be executed in utero.

Under English common law, a woman “quick with child” (meaning fetal movement could be felt) could not be executed until after delivery. The law recognized the unborn as a distinct life, entitled to protection, even when the mother was condemned. In theory, Bathsheba’s claim required a serious, careful investigation.

In practice, the process was rushed and compromised.

A panel of two male midwives and a jury of twelve matrons examined Bathsheba. They concluded that she was not yet “quick with child.” On that basis, the Council denied her petition. Only later, as doubts grew and additional medical voices weighed in, did some of those examiners reverse themselves and say they now believed she was indeed quickening.

By then, the political machinery was already rolling toward execution. The Deputy Secretary of the Commonwealth, John Avery Jr.—a man with deep Patriot credentials and little sympathy for Loyalist families—signed the warrant. Governor’s Council members, many of whom had personal or political enmity toward Timothy Ruggles, did not intervene.

On July 2, 1778, the hangings went forward.

The gallows in Worcester

The execution was staged in Worcester before a crowd estimated at around 5,000 spectators—massive by the standards of the day. It was not just a punishment; it was a public statement: this new state, born of rebellion, could and would enforce its laws without fear or favor, even against an elite woman with powerful connections.

The order of death underscored both gender and hierarchy. The three men—Ross, Buchanan, and Brooks—were executed first. Then Bathsheba was brought forward.

Accounts describe her as composed and dignified, addressing the sheriff with a chilling, almost serene farewell. She expressed readiness for death and a hope of heavenly reunion with those she loved. Whether this reflects genuine piety, performative composure, or a survivor’s bias in the retelling, it solidified her image as a woman who met the scaffold with remarkable calm.

The hangman’s rope was tightened. The daughter of Timothy Ruggles, the wife of Joshua Spooner, the lover of Ezra Ross, dropped from the platform and died.

But the story did not end there.

A fifth victim: the unborn child

At Bathsheba’s own prior request, a post‑execution examination was conducted. Physicians and midwives opened her body and found a male fetus of roughly five months’ gestation—well‑formed and unmistakably viable for the period’s standards of “quickening.” The child had been, quite literally, hanged with his mother.

The autopsy findings ignited quiet controversy. In the centuries since, they have fueled a persistent argument: that Bathsheba’s execution was not merely a tragic application of the law but a deliberate, politically inflamed disregard of the law’s protections for pregnant women.

Most historians now agree that the child was almost certainly Ezra Ross’s. The timeline of their affair, combined with Bathsheba’s insistence that he was “lawfully begotten,” reads as strategic misdirection: a bid to present the fetus as Joshua’s legitimate heir. Whether the Council suspected the truth or simply did not care, their refusal to stay the execution stands as one of the case’s most enduring moral stains.

Politics, gender, and punishment

Why did Bathsheba Spooner hang?

The easy answer is that she conspired to murder her husband and the evidence was overwhelming. But in the layered reality of Revolutionary Massachusetts, that explanation is incomplete.

Several factors magnified the likelihood—and the timing—of her execution:

Loyalist lineage: As Timothy Ruggles’s daughter, Bathsheba bore the symbolic weight of a hated Tory elite. Executing her was, for some Patriots, a proxy blow against the old order.
Gender and defiance: Bathsheba violated not only the law but deeply held expectations of female behavior. She asserted sexual agency, manipulated men, and orchestrated violence—all traits that threatened the gender hierarchy of the time.
New state, new resolve: Massachusetts in 1778 was still establishing its legitimacy. Showing that even an elite woman would face the gallows may have been seen as proof that the rule of law trumped status and sentiment.
Wartime hysteria: With the British still in the field and Loyalist plots a recurring fear, a case involving a Loyalist’s daughter, a Continental soldier, and British deserters could not help but be politicized.

Modern legal scholars who revisit the case often conclude that, under today’s standards, Bathsheba might well have been found not guilty by reason of insanity or at least granted a reprieve until after childbirth. At minimum, the law’s protection for pregnant women almost certainly would have been honored.

A legacy in shadow

Bathsheba’s grave is unmarked. Tradition holds that she was buried in Worcester in or near land owned by her sister’s family, but the exact location is known only to a shrinking circle of descendants and local historians. Joshua rests elsewhere, his well long since filled and the landscape changed.

Their children’s lives unfolded with a mixture of success and tragedy: one son became a prosperous businessman; another died at sea; their daughter is said to have struggled with profound mental illness, reinforcing contemporary claims of hereditary instability in the Ruggles line.

As for the co‑conspirators, they survive in memory largely as supporting players in Bathsheba’s drama. Ross, the boy soldier, is often cast as a seduced innocent; Buchanan and Brooks, as opportunists whose own desertion made them easy prey for a woman offering shelter and coin. Their “dying speeches,” printed and sold as broadsides, frame them as repentant sinners and Bathsheba as the prime mover.

Why this case still matters

For true crime, the Bathsheba Spooner case offers everything: a love affair, a murder plot, a botched cover‑up, confessions, a sensational trial, and a hanging before thousands. But to leave it there is to miss its deeper resonance.

This is also a story about:

How new nations use punishment to define themselves
How women who defy gender norms attract disproportionate outrage
How law and politics collide when a defendant embodies a hated elite
How the lives of unborn children have been rhetorically and legally weaponized

In an age when we still debate capital punishment, reproductive autonomy, and the criminalization of intimate partner violence, Bathsheba’s fate feels unsettlingly current. She was a killer. She was also a woman trapped in a brutal marriage, vilified for her politics and sexuality, and executed in a way that violated the protections the law claimed to afford.

The well in Brookfield, the gallows in Worcester, the unmarked grave, and the silent, unnamed fetus together form one of the most haunting tableaux of early American justice. It is a tableau worth revisiting—not to excuse, but to understand.

START READING KRIS CALVERT'S BOOKS TODAY FOR FREE

Sources used for this podcast:

Navas, D. (2018). The most extraordinary murder. Journal of the American Revolution. Retrieved from https://allthingsliberty.com/2018/09/the-most-extraordinary-murder/

Green, S. S. (n.d.). The case of Bathsheba Spooner. Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society. Retrieved from https://www.americanantiquarian.org/proceedings/48055767.pdf

Anonymous. (1778). The lives, last words, and dying speech of Ezra Ross, James Buchanan, and William Brooks, who were executed at Worcester, on Thursday the 2d day of July, 1778 for the murder of Mr. Joshua Spooner, of Brookfield. Retrieved from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/evans/N33098.0001.001/1:1?rgn=div1;view=fulltext

Early American Crime. (2010, January 5). Bathsheba Spooner, accessory to the murder of her husband. Retrieved from https://www.earlyamericancrime.com/criminals/bathsheba-spooner

Whitman-Hanson Express. (2023, October 4). Another mystery in history. Retrieved from https://whitmanhansonexpress.com/another-mystery-in-history/

The Wanderer. (2021, October 29). Rochester’s connection to Bathsheba Spooner. Retrieved from https://www.wanderer.com/features/rochesters-connection-to-bathsheba-spooner/

Executed Today. (2020, July 1). 1778: Bathsheba Spooner, the first woman hanged in the USA. Retrieved from https://www.executedtoday.com/tag/1778/

Mass & More Genealogy. (2011, September 17). Bathsheba Ruggles Spooner executed 2 July 1778. Retrieved from http://massandmoregenealogy.blogspot.com/2011/09/bathsheba-ruggles-spooner-executed-2.html

Historic Ipswich. (2026, February 3). The hanging of Ezra Ross and Bathsheba Spooner, July 2, 1778. Retrieved from https://historicipswich.net/category/revolutionary-war/

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Bathsheba Spooner. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathsheba_Spooner

Additional Bathsheba / Ruggles context

Navas, D. (2001). Murdered by his wife: An absorbing tale of real life crime and punishment in eighteenth-century Massachusetts. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press. (Description/preview via Google Books: https://books.google.com/books/about/Murdered_by_His_Wife.html?id=Ufhyl3vhPZgC)

Journal of the American Revolution. (n.d.). Timothy Ruggles. In The most extraordinary murder (sidebar/biographical entry). Retrieved from https://allthingsliberty.com/2018/09/the-most-extraordinary-murder/timothy-ruggles/

Biblical Bathsheba and name context

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). Bathsheba. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Bathsheba-biblical-figure

Bible Gateway. (n.d.). 2 Samuel 11 (New International Version). Retrieved from https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+11&version=NIV

Bible Gateway. (n.d.). Bathsheba, Bath-Sheba – Encyclopedia of the Bible. Retrieved from https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/encyclopedia-of-the-bible/Bathsheba-Bath-Sheba

TheTorah.com. (n.d.). Bathsheba the kingmaker. Retrieved from https://www.thetorah.com/article/bathsheba-the-kingmakerBath

“Tory” term and Loyalist context

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Tory. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tory

BBC News. (2015, April 7). ‘Conservative’ or ‘Tory’: What’s in a name? Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-30899534

Online Etymology Dictionary. (n.d.). Tory. Retrieved from https://www.etymonline.com/word/Tory

Declaration of Independence & founding context

National Archives. (n.d.). Declaration of Independence (1776). America’s Founding Documents. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/declaration-of-independence

National Archives. (n.d.). Declaration of Independence. Historical documents. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/historical-docs/declaration

Constitution Center. (2023, August 1). On this day, the Declaration of Independence is officially signed. Retrieved from https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-the-declaration-of-independence-is-officially-signed

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). United States Declaration of Independence. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_Independence

Constituting America. (n.d.). John Hancock of Massachusetts: First and largest signature on the Declaration of Independence (Val Crofts). Retrieved from https://constitutingamerica.org/90day-dcin-john-hancock-of-massachusetts-first-and-largest-signature-on-the-declaration-of-independence-guest-essayist-val-crofts/

Smithsonian Institution. (n.d.). Signers of the Declaration of Independence. American Revolutionary War spotlight. Retrieved from https://www.si.edu/spotlight/american-revolutionary-war/signers-declaration-independence

UCF. (2019, July 1). 7 little-known facts about the Declaration of Independence. Retrieved from https://www.ucf.edu/news/7-little-known-facts-declaration-independence/

Britannica. (2025, September 9). Where was the Declaration of Independence signed? Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/question/Where-was-the-Declaration-of-Independence-signed

Paul Revere, William Dawes, and Revolutionary rides

Paul Revere House. (2023, July 10). The midnight ride – the real story. Retrieved from https://www.paulreverehouse.org/the-real-story/

PBS. (2019, January 22). William Dawes. American Experience. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/patriotsday-william-dawes/

Constitution Facts. (n.d.). Voices of the Revolution: The five riders. Retrieved from https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-declaration-of-independence/the-five-riders/

Lexington History Museums. (n.d.). Paul Revere’s ride. Retrieved from https://www.lexingtonhistory.org/paulrevere

Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum. (n.d.). Paul Revere’s ride. Retrieved from https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/paul-reveres-ride

History.com Editors. (n.d.). The midnight ride of William Dawes. History.com. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/articles/the-midnight-ride-of-william-dawes

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Paul Revere. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Revere

U.S. Army. (2024). National Guard units trace history to battles of Lexington & Concord. Retrieved from https://www.army.mil/article/284383/national_guard_units_trace_history_to_battles_of_lexington_concord

Revolutionary sites, imagery, & background

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Stamp Act Congress. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. (Image: Federal Hall, Wall Street and Trinity Church, New York 1789.) Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stamp_Act_Congress#/media/File:Federal_Hall,_Wall_Street_and_Trinity_Church,_New_York_1789.jpg

Philip Marc Sons of Liberty. (n.d.). Franklin’s “Join, or Die” cartoon. Retrieved from https://www.philipmarcsonsofliberty.com/franklins-join-or-die.html#/

History on the Net. (n.d.). John Dickinson: Penman of the Revolution. Retrieved from https://www.historyonthenet.com/founding-fathers-john-dickinson-penman-revolution

Warfare History Network. (n.d.). How the Boston Tea Party sparked a revolution. Retrieved from https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/how-the-boston-tea-party-sparked-a-revolution/

Picryl. (n.d.). Carpenters’ Hall – First Continental Congress (image collection). Retrieved from https://picryl.com/topics/carpenters+hall/first+continental+congress

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Carpenters’ Hall. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenters%27_Hall

Metropolitan Museum of Art. (n.d.). [Specific artwork page – check title/artist on site] (Accession no. 380487). Retrieved from https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/380487

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). Patrick Henry. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Patrick-Henry

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Independence Hall. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. (Image: Independence Hall Detail 1752.) Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence_Hall#/media/File:Independence_Hall_Detail_1752.jpg

National Park Service. (n.d.). Evacuation of Boston, 1776. Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/evacuation-of-boston-1776.htm

Emerging Revolutionary War. (2016, January 12). James Monroe at the Battle of Trenton. Retrieved from https://emergingrevolutionarywar.org/2016/01/12/james-monroe-at-the-battle-of-trenton/

Westborough Center for History and Culture. (n.d.). Hidden histories: Parkman. Retrieved from https://www.westboroughcenter.org/hidden/parkman/

British Battles. (n.d.). Battle of Ticonderoga 1777. Retrieved from https://www.britishbattles.com/war-of-the-revolution-1775-to-1783/battle-of-ticonderoga-1777/

Virginia Places. (n.d.). French and Indian War in Virginia. Retrieved from https://www.virginiaplaces.org/military/frenchandindian.html

Biographical references (founders, judges, officials)

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). George III. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_III

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Thomas Jefferson. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson

Wikiversity contributors. (n.d.). President of the United States/Thomas Jefferson. In Wikiversity. Retrieved from https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States/Thomas_Jefferson

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). William Cushing. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Cushing

Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). John Avery Jr. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. (Image file: John_Avery,_Jr..png.) Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Avery_Jr.#/media/File:John_Avery,_Jr..png

GenealogyBlog. (2016). [Specific post – confirm title on page] Retrieved from https://www.genealogyblog.com/?p=41126

Geni.com. (n.d.). Bathsheba Ruggles Spooner – genealogy profile. Retrieved from https://www.geni.com/people/Bathsheba-Ruggles-Spooner/298200243320003679

Maps, plans, commercial listings

Etsy. (n.d.). Hardwick 1795 town plan – old roads [Map listing]. Retrieved from https://www.etsy.com/listing/996541098/hardwick-1795-town-plan-old-roads

eBay. (n.d.). [Listing no. 393991492994 – historical item] Retrieved from https://www.ebay.com/itm/393991492994

Mount Vernon. (n.d.). A letter to Dinwiddie [Special collections and archives]. George Washington’s Mount Vernon. Retrieved from https://www.mountvernon.org/library/research-library/special-collections-and-archives/a-letter-to-dinwiddie

Amazon. (n.d.). [Book/product – see page for full title] (ASIN B08Y6CWCV3). Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08Y6CWCV3

Media, pop‑culture, and other narrative references

Miranda, L.-M. (Writer), & Kail, T. (Director). (2020). Hamilton [Filmed stage musical]. United States: Disney+ / Walt Disney Studios.

Fox, H. (Director). (1987). The secret of my success [Film]. United States: Universal Pictures.

Weitzman, M. (Writer), & Weitzman, M. (Director). (2010). A Piñata named Desire (Season 6, Episode 1) [TV series episode]. In American Dad!. USA: Fox.

Chase, D. (Creator). (2004). The Sopranos (Season 5, Episode 12) [TV series episode]. HBO.

The Denver Post. (2007, August 15). “Duct tape bandit” arrested in Ky. Retrieved from https://www.denverpost.com/2007/08/15/duct-tape-bandit-arrested-in-ky/

YouTube: https://youtu.be/oVbzMjyx0AA

DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY

All information contained in this audio podcast or video presentation is provided for entertainment purposes only. The authors leave any and all conclusions to individual members of the audience. The author offers no statements of fact beyond those available through diligent private research or through information freely available in the public record. To the extent that pending or settled criminal matters or crime or possible crimes, are discussed in this audio podcast or video presentation, all parties or defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. To the extent that any pending or settled civil matters are discussed in this video presentation, all parties or defendants are presumed not liable unless proven liable in a court of law. Copyright for material incorporated and presented under Fair Use is retained by the original author or copyright holder where applicable. Our cases are researched using open source and archive materials, and the subjects are real crimes and people. We strive to produce each episode with respect to the victims, their families and loved ones. At Hitched 2 Homicide we are committed to always discussing how victims lived, and not just how they died. All podcast information is gleaned from sources given. All opinions in the podcast are solely of Hitched 2 Homicide and are for entertainment purposes only. All suspects are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Copyright & OwnershipThis podcast episode, including all audio, video, and written content, is the property of Hitched 2 Homicide and its creators, © 2025 Kris Calvert & Rob Pottorf of RP Music, Inc. All rights reserved.

Do not copy, reproduce, or distribute any part of this content without express written permission.For licensing, press inquiries, or collaboration requests, contact: kris@hitched2homicide.comFor more true crime episodes, visit: www.Hitched2Homicide.com Thanks for listening and remember… Southern charm won’t save you from true crime.