The Villisca Axe Murders of 1912: Eight Victims, an Unsolved Crime, and a House That Became a Haunted Legend

14 hours ago

21 min read

On the morning of June 10, 1912, a quiet house in Villisca, Iowa, concealed a devastating crime. Josiah and Sarah Moore, their four children, and two young sisters visiting for a sleepover had been killed with an axe. Eight people were dead, six of them children. Despite years of investigation, competing accusations, a confession, and two criminal trials, no one was convicted of their murders. The case remains unsolved.

Today, the former Moore home is known as the Villisca Axe Murder House. Visitors arrive not only to learn about the killings but also to investigate reports of children’s voices, unexplained footsteps, and other alleged paranormal activity. The building has become a place where historical tragedy, unresolved suspicion, and haunted-house folklore overlap.

Understanding Villisca requires separating those layers. The victims were real people with families and connections to their community. The suspects faced accusations of sharply varying credibility. The haunting stories belong to the house’s later history, not to the evidence that establishes who committed the murders.

The house still stands. The questions remain. And the person responsible was never conclusively identified.

Villisca Before the Murders

In 1912, Villisca was a small southwestern Iowa community in Montgomery County, with roughly 2,000 residents. Its businesses served the surrounding agricultural region, and its railway connections brought a steady flow of travelers through town. Those tracks later became important to one explanation for the murders: an outsider might have arrived, killed, and departed before anyone realized what had happened.

The Moore family lived at 508 East Second Street. Josiah, commonly called Joe, was a successful businessman whose work and extended family made him well known locally. He had established his own hardware and agricultural-implement business after working for another prominent Villisca merchant, Frank F. Jones. That commercial rivalry would eventually become central to the most persistent local conspiracy theory.

Sarah was active in the Presbyterian Church. On June 9, she helped coordinate a Children’s Day program in which the Moore children participated. It was a Sunday-school celebration—an evening of recitations, performances, and socializing rather than anything that suggested danger.

The contrast between that ordinary gathering and the violence that followed helps explain why the crime so profoundly unsettled Villisca.

Who Were the Eight Victims?

The victims are often introduced as a single household, but two families suffered losses that night. The entire Moore family was killed. The Stillinger family lost two daughters who happened to be staying with their friends.

Published accounts sometimes vary in name spellings and ages. Sarah also appears as Sara; Mary Katherine is frequently called Katherine; Arthur Boyd is often called Boyd. Lena Stillinger is commonly listed as 12, although some historical summaries give her age as 11. The profiles below use the names and ages most consistently presented by Iowa Cold Cases and the Iowa legislative historical summary, while acknowledging that discrepancy.

Josiah B. “Joe” Moore, 43

Born in 1868, Josiah Moore was a husband, father of four, and established Villisca businessman. His parents and several siblings lived in the community, placing him within a substantial local family network. He married Sarah Montgomery on December 6, 1899, at her parents’ home.

Moore had worked for Frank Jones before opening a competing business in 1907. He also secured the valuable John Deere account, intensifying the commercial competition between the two men. The rivalry was real; the later allegation that it led to murder was never proved.

Joe’s identity became entangled with theories about business revenge and an alleged affair. Those accusations should not obscure the more firmly established facts: he supported a young family, operated a local business, and belonged to a community in which many people knew him personally.

Sarah Montgomery Moore, 39

Sarah, born in 1873, was the mother of Herman, Katherine, Boyd, and Paul. Her church work provides one of the clearest surviving glimpses of her life. She helped organize the Children’s Day service that the family attended on its final evening.

Her role was not incidental. The children performed their recitations as part of a program she had helped prepare. Before the house became a crime scene, the evening belonged to a mother watching her children participate in their church community.

Herman Montgomery Moore, 11

Herman, born in 1900, was the oldest Moore child. He attended the Children’s Day program with his parents and siblings and slept upstairs with the other Moore children that night.

Reliable public summaries preserve relatively little about his individual interests or personality. That absence should not be filled with invented anecdotes. What survives establishes his place as the eldest child in a family whose ordinary life ended abruptly.

Mary Katherine Moore, 10

Mary Katherine, born in 1902 and usually called Katherine, was the Moores’ only daughter. Lena and Ina Stillinger were her friends, and their overnight visit connected the two families to the same tragedy.

The house’s historical account explains that the Stillinger sisters occupied a downstairs bed while Katherine slept upstairs with her brothers. Her friendship with the visiting girls is an important part of the story: the sleepover was a familiar childhood arrangement, not an inherently dangerous decision.

Arthur Boyd Moore, 7

Arthur Boyd, born in 1905, is commonly identified as Boyd in accounts of the case. He was the third Moore child and one of the four children sleeping in the upstairs room adjacent to their parents’ bedroom.

As with Herman, the readily available historical summaries provide little dependable information about his hobbies or temperament. His full name and family relationships help restore an individual identity to someone too often reduced to an age in a victim list.

Paul Vernon Moore, 5

Paul, born in 1907, was the youngest Moore child and the youngest person killed in the house. He attended the church program with the rest of the family and returned home with them that evening.

At five, he had barely begun his life. His death, alongside those of his three older siblings, meant that no member of Joe and Sarah’s immediate household survived.

Lena Gertrude Stillinger, Usually Listed as 12

Lena, born in 1900, was the older of the two visiting sisters. She and Ina belonged to a farming family living outside Villisca. The house’s historical account places their family’s farm about seven miles from town and describes them as friends of Katherine Moore.

Most commonly used summaries list Lena as 12, while Nancy Bowers’s account for Iowa Unsolved Murders gives her age as 11. That inconsistency is worth noting rather than silently choosing one version as beyond dispute.

Lena later became especially prominent in crime-scene theories because investigators believed she might have awakened during the attack. However, the frequently repeated claim that she had a defensive wound is disputed, and it should not be presented as settled

Ina Mae Stillinger, 8

Ina, whose middle name also appears as May, was Lena’s younger sister. Born in 1903, she accompanied Lena to the church program and then to the Moore home for the overnight visit.

Their father, identified in historical accounts as Joe Stillinger, later remained convinced of the theory implicating Frank Jones, even after the supposed hired killer was released. His suspicions illustrate how the unsolved crime continued to affect the bereaved families.

The sisters were buried together in Villisca Cemetery, separate from the Moore family plot. Their shared grave remains a reminder that the murders devastated more than one household.

The Last Evening: Sunday, June 9, 1912

The Moores and the Stillinger sisters attended the Presbyterian Church’s Children’s Day program on Sunday evening. Sarah helped coordinate it, and the children participated. The program and subsequent socializing lasted until approximately 9:30 p.m.

According to the house’s historical account, Joe had contacted the Stillinger household earlier that evening to arrange permission for the sisters to stay overnight. After church, the eight walked the short distance to the Moore home, arriving around 9:45 to 10 p.m.

Some retellings describe milk and cookies before bed. Iowa Cold Cases includes that detail, but the house’s own account says it is unclear whether the group ate or drank anything after returning. The bedtime snack therefore belongs among the familiar but uncertain details of the story.

The sleeping arrangements placed:

Joe and Sarah in an upstairs bedroom.
The four Moore children in an adjacent upstairs room.
Lena and Ina in a downstairs room used for sewing and sleeping accommodation.

By morning, all eight were dead.

What Happened Inside the House?

Doctors estimated that the killings occurred between midnight and approximately 5 a.m. on June 10. The generally accepted reconstruction places the initial attack in the parents’ room, followed by the Moore children’s room and then the room occupied by the Stillinger sisters downstairs. This is a reconstruction from the scene—not an eyewitness account of the killer’s movements.

The weapon was an axe belonging to Joe Moore, apparently taken from the property. It was left in the downstairs room where the sisters were found. Historical accounts describe the blunt portion of the axe as the principal striking surface, although the exact sequence and number of blows cannot be established with the confidence sometimes suggested in dramatic retellings.

Marks on upstairs ceilings were interpreted as damage caused by the weapon’s upswing. The victims remained in their beds, and their heads or faces had been covered with bedding or clothing.

Several features made the scene especially puzzling.

Covered Mirrors, Windows, and Faces

Accounts describe mirrors and some glass surfaces covered with clothing or cloth. The victims’ faces were also concealed.

Those actions have inspired competing interpretations: the killer might have wanted to avoid seeing the bodies, reduce visibility from outside, or act on a private superstition. Some writers have suggested that the murderer feared being watched by the dead or by reflections. None of these explanations establishes the killer’s actual motive.

The Altered Oil Lamps

Historical reconstructions describe oil lamps with their glass chimneys removed and wicks adjusted to produce very low light. Similar lamp arrangements appeared in other murders later compared with Villisca.

This detail matters because it is more distinctive than the use of an axe alone. An axe was an accessible household tool; a particular method of modifying a lamp may offer a more useful point of comparison between crimes. Even so, similarity is not proof of a common perpetrator.

The Slab of Bacon

A slab of bacon was reportedly left near the axe. Accounts disagree about its weight and precise arrangement. Its purpose remains unexplained.

Later theories have assigned it sexual or symbolic significance. The surviving descriptions do not establish any such interpretation. The responsible conclusion is narrower: an unusual item was reported at the scene, and no proven explanation connects it to the murderer.

Did Lena Wake Up?

Several historical summaries state that Lena may have awakened and resisted. The Iowa legislative account repeats the claim of a defensive wound on her arm.

However, a 2026 comment posted under historian Edgar Epperly’s name on the Iowa Cold Cases page directly challenges that story, stating that the apparent injury was blood that washed away during preparation for burial. Because that correction appears in a comment rather than a reproduced medical report, it should be attributed cautiously—but it demonstrates that the alleged wound is contested.

Doctors reportedly found no evidence of sexual assault, despite descriptions of Lena’s disturbed clothing. That distinction matters: an inferred sexual motive is not equivalent to a documented assault.

The Discovery on June 10

At approximately 7:30 a.m., neighbor Mary Peckham became concerned by the absence of activity at the Moore home. The family had not appeared for its usual morning routines, and no one answered the door. She contacted Joe’s brother, Ross Moore.

Ross entered using a key and discovered the bodies of the Stillinger sisters in the downstairs bedroom. The town’s peace officer, Henry “Hank” Horton, was summoned. His search revealed the other six victims upstairs.

The discovery immediately transformed the house into the center of public attention. Unfortunately, it did not become a securely controlled crime scene.

How the Investigation Lost Its Best Opportunity

One of the case’s greatest obstacles was the movement of people through the house after the bodies were discovered. Doctors, officials, and curious residents entered, and historical accounts describe extensive contamination of the scene. Smithsonian’s reconstruction reports that as many as 100 people passed through the home.

That traffic complicated the interpretation of fingerprints, disturbed objects, and introduced uncertainty about what the killer had actually left behind. Investigators also lacked a clear sighting of the attacker or a reliable account of an escape route.

Villisca’s railway connections created another difficulty. A stranger could potentially have departed during the hours between the murders and their discovery. Conversely, a local offender could have returned home unnoticed. The evidence did not decisively distinguish between those possibilities.

The result was fertile ground for suspicion. Business disputes, personal grudges, unusual behavior, and rumors all became substitutes for a missing evidentiary link.

The Major Suspects and Theories

Reverend Lyn George Jacklin Kelly: The Confession That Did Not Produce a Conviction

Kelly was an English-born traveling minister who was in Villisca during the church gathering and left town early the next morning. His presence, fascination with the case, and later conduct made him the most consequential suspect in the criminal proceedings.

Investigators examined allegations that he discussed the murders before the bodies had been discovered. They also scrutinized letters, reports of bloody clothing sent for laundering, and his return to the murder house while presenting himself as a detective. Some of that testimony proved unstable or contested.

Kelly had documented mental-health difficulties and was later convicted in a separate case involving obscene correspondence. These facts influenced contemporary suspicion, but neither mental illness nor a separate offense proves responsibility for the Villisca murders.

In 1917, Kelly was indicted for Lena Stillinger’s murder. After prolonged interrogation, he signed a confession in which he claimed religious commands had driven him to kill. He subsequently recanted it.

His first trial ended with a hung jury; the second ended in acquittal in November 1917. He was the only suspect brought to trial for the Villisca killings.

The case against Kelly remains troubling because it contains both apparently incriminating circumstances and serious reliability problems. His confession cannot be responsibly discussed without its interrogation context, retraction, and the failure to obtain a conviction.

Frank F. Jones: Business Revenge and an Alleged Affair

Frank Jones was a prominent businessman and Iowa state senator. Joe Moore had worked for him before establishing a competing business and taking the valuable John Deere account. That history gave investigators and residents an identifiable source of animosity.

A second allegation concerned an affair between Joe and Jones’s daughter-in-law, Dona Jones. The alleged relationship became a central ingredient in the revenge theory, but it should remain labeled an allegation rather than treated as an established fact.

The theory generally did not require Jones to wield the axe himself. Instead, it proposed that he arranged a murder for hire.

Private investigator James Wilkerson of the Burns Detective Agency aggressively promoted that explanation. His accusations helped divide the town and damaged Jones’s political career. Some residents believed the senator’s influence protected him from prosecution. Jones was never convicted of involvement, and the alleged conspiracy was not established.

The distinction is essential: a plausible grievance can explain why someone became a suspect, but it cannot establish that the suspect commissioned eight murders.

William Mansfield: The Supposed Hired Killer

Wilkerson identified William Mansfield as the man allegedly employed by Jones. Suspicion was intensified by Mansfield’s connection to another axe-murder investigation involving members of his own family in Blue Island, Illinois, in 1914. Being a suspect in that crime did not establish guilt there or in Villisca.

Mansfield was investigated in 1916, but payroll records placed him in Illinois at the time of the Villisca murders. He was released for lack of evidence.

Those records presented a major problem for Wilkerson’s proposed conspiracy. Nevertheless, some relatives of the victims remained convinced that Jones was responsible. The allegation outlived the evidentiary case offered to support it.

Henry Lee Moore: A Convicted Axe Murderer, but Not a Proven Villisca Killer

Henry Lee Moore was unrelated to the murdered Moore family. He was convicted of killing his mother and grandmother with an axe in Columbia, Missouri, later in 1912.

Federal investigator Matthew McClaughry considered him a possible perpetrator of a wider series of murders. The theory linked Villisca to other attacks on sleeping households across the Midwest.

Henry Moore’s actual conviction makes him more than a figure created by rumor. However, it does not place him in the Villisca house. His family murders also involved an apparent property-related motive, complicating the claim that they belonged to a series of stranger killings.

Andrew Sawyer: Suspicion Undermined by an Alibi

Andrew Sawyer was a transient whose behavior reportedly alarmed a railroad work crew. Accounts describe his interest in newspaper reports about the murders and his habit of keeping an axe nearby.

Investigators eventually established that he had been detained for vagrancy in Osceola on the night of the crime. He was dismissed as a suspect.

Sawyer’s case illustrates a recurrent problem in the investigation: behavior that seemed odd or frightening could attract attention without providing a genuine connection to the killings.

Sam Moyer: A Family Grudge That Did Not Establish Guilt

Sam Moyer, Joe Moore’s brother-in-law, attracted suspicion because of reported threats against Joe. Further investigation established an alibi that cleared him.

His inclusion in the case demonstrates how quickly personal conflict became investigative material after the murders—and why an account of the suspects must include exculpatory information, not merely accusations.

Was Villisca Part of a Serial-Killer Campaign?

The unidentified traveling-killer theory offers a different explanation from the local revenge narrative. It asks whether the Moores were selected not because of Joe’s business dealings, but because their home fit an offender’s preferred circumstances.

Researchers have compared Villisca with attacks in Colorado Springs, Colorado; Monmouth, Illinois; Ellsworth, Kansas; and Paola, Kansas. The Paola murders occurred only days before the Villisca killings.

Recurring features included:

Attacks on people asleep in their homes.
Weapons obtained locally and abandoned afterward.
Houses near railway lines.
Victims’ faces covered after death.
Evidence that the offender lingered or washed at the scene.
In some cases, similarly altered oil lamps.

The combination is suggestive, especially when unusual details occur together. However, the proposed grouping remains uncertain. Axes were widely available, railway lines served many communities, and historical newspaper reports vary in completeness and accuracy. Not every similar crime necessarily belongs to the same offender.

Paul Mueller and The Man from the Train

In their 2017 book The Man from the Train, Bill James and Rachel McCarthy James proposed that a previously overlooked traveling murderer committed a long series of family killings, including Villisca. They identified Paul Mueller as their likely suspect.

Mueller had been connected to an 1897 family murder in Massachusetts. The authors used archival newspaper research and recurring crime-scene characteristics to argue that he could explain later attacks across multiple states.

Their theory is significant because it attempts to connect the crimes systematically rather than relying on Villisca’s local gossip. But it remains a historical argument. Mueller has not been conclusively established as the Villisca killer, and the authors’ attribution of other murders should not be presented as an official solved-case count.

The broader possibility of a traveling serial offender and the specific identification of Mueller are separate claims. The first could be correct even if the second is wrong.

Conspiracies, Rumors, and Details That Became “Facts”

An unsolved crime can accumulate explanations faster than evidence. Villisca is especially vulnerable because its earliest reporting already mixed observation, hearsay, and conjecture.

The Political Cover-Up Theory

The most substantial conspiracy allegation claimed that Jones commissioned the murders and used his influence to escape accountability. Contemporary divisions included religious loyalties, with some residents aligning their suspicions with the affiliations of Jones and the Moore family.

That division helps explain why the controversy endured. It does not prove a cover-up. The failure to convict someone, particularly after an investigation compromised by weak and contaminated evidence, is not itself evidence that powerful people suppressed the truth.

The Killer Hidden in the Attic or a Closet

Many modern accounts state that the murderer hid inside the house while the family attended church. Others place him in a barn or an upstairs closet. These are proposed reconstructions, not securely established events.

Comments posted under Edgar Epperly’s name on Iowa Cold Cases challenge the often-repeated story of cigarette evidence and a hiding place in a closet, describing it as a rumor amplified by a reporter. Those comments should be treated as attributed corrections, not as substitutes for the original records—but they provide a reason not to narrate the hiding-place story with certainty.

The Killer’s Meal

Accounts variously describe uneaten food, partially eaten food, or a meal consumed by the murderer. These versions are not consistent. An attributed Epperly comment also challenges the claim that evidence established a meal left by the killer.

The image of an offender calmly eating after killing eight people is memorable. Its dramatic power does not make it reliable.

Occult and Supernatural Explanations

The covered mirrors and unexplained bacon have encouraged symbolic interpretations. But the material examined here does not establish an occult conspiracy or supernatural cause.

There were also contemporary rumors that investigators had recovered an image of the killer from Lena’s eyes, and racially charged speculation based on an alleged footprint. Nancy Bowers records these as part of the rumor-filled aftermath, not as credible solutions.

These stories reveal something about the frightened community searching for an answer. They do not reveal the murderer’s identity.

The Funeral and the Families Left Behind

The victims’ funeral took place on June 12, 1912, in Villisca’s town square. Thousands attended, and National Guard troops helped maintain order. A long procession carried the coffins to Villisca Cemetery.

The six Moores were buried in a family plot, while Lena and Ina were buried side by side under a shared marker.

The crime’s aftermath extended far beyond the funeral. Investigations, grand jury proceedings, litigation, and public accusations continued for years. The town’s social divisions became part of the case’s history, and suspicion could not provide the closure that a sound prosecution might have offered.

How the Moore Home Became the Villisca Axe Murder House

The building remained a residence after the killings and housed subsequent occupants. In 1994, Darwin and Martha Linn purchased it and restored it to evoke its early-20th-century appearance. Period furnishings were arranged with reference to historical photographs.

That distinction matters: the house is the original crime location, but its present interpretation includes restoration and replacement furnishings. Visitors are not necessarily looking at an untouched scene preserved since 1912.

The restored house became a historical attraction offering tours and overnight stays. Its connection to an unresolved mass murder also made it a destination for paranormal investigators and television productions.

The setting carries an undeniable emotional weight. Whether visitors interpret that weight as historical atmosphere, psychological unease, or a supernatural presence is another question.

The Haunted Aspect: What People Report

The house’s paranormal reputation centers particularly on the children and on the spaces associated with the killings.

Reported experiences include:

Children’s voices and unexplained vocal sounds.
Footsteps when no visible person appears to be walking.
Objects allegedly moving or falling.
Shadows or apparitions.
Electronic devices producing responses interpreted as communication.

These are reports and interpretations, not established evidence that the victims’ spirits remain in the home.

Voices and Paranormal Equipment

A 2025 KETV report documented a visit with property manager Kelly Mattson and a paranormal investigator. Mattson described footsteps and voices as familiar occurrences. The team used electromagnetic-field detection devices and equipment intended to produce words through radio frequencies or other outputs.

The resulting sounds and device activations were interpreted during the visit as possible signs of spirits. The report did not establish that the responses came from the murder victims or identified the killer.

That limitation is important. A recording interpreted as a child’s voice is not proof that a particular child produced it, and a device response cannot serve as historical testimony about the murders.

The Attic’s Place in the Legend

The attic has become especially prominent because visitors are often told the killer waited there. KETV’s report repeats that interpretation. Yet the murderer’s hiding place remains uncertain.

This illustrates how the historical and paranormal stories reinforce one another: an unproved crime reconstruction gives a room a sinister identity, and unsettling experiences in that room can then seem to confirm the original reconstruction.

The 2014 Stabbing Incident

In November 2014, a visitor was injured in a self-inflicted stabbing during an overnight paranormal investigation. The event became part of the house’s modern notoriety and is included among the news reports collected by Iowa Cold Cases.[iowacoldcases]

It should not be recast as evidence of possession or an attack by a ghost. The documented human injury and a supernatural explanation are entirely different claims.

Is the Villisca House Really Haunted?

The responsible answer is that the house has a well-documented reputation for being haunted, but the sources discussed here do not establish a supernatural presence.

That distinction does not require dismissing every visitor as dishonest. People may sincerely report frightening or unusual experiences. What remains unresolved is their cause, and sincerity alone cannot demonstrate that a sound, shadow, or electronic response originated with a spirit.

The haunting tradition is nevertheless part of Villisca’s cultural history. It has helped keep public attention on the house and the murders, while sometimes pushing the victims’ lives into the background. Historical interpretation and ghost tourism coexist there, but they should not be confused with one another.

Why Has the Crime Never Been Solved?

The principal barriers appear throughout the history of the investigation:

The crime scene was inadequately protected and heavily contaminated.
The offender had hours to leave before discovery.
No dependable eyewitness account established the killer’s identity.
Local disputes and rumors generated accusations that exceeded the evidence.
The case against Kelly relied on contested testimony and a recanted confession.
Proposed connections to other murders remain inferential rather than conclusive.

The limitations also affect modern research. A historical theory may organize scattered evidence convincingly without producing the kind of direct link needed to identify an offender with confidence.

Villisca therefore remains a case in which several explanations can be discussed, but none should be announced as a proved solution.

Remembering Villisca Beyond the Legend

The enduring image of Villisca is often an axe, a darkened bedroom, or a ghost hunter waiting for a voice. The more important image is a family and two visiting sisters returning from a church program on a Sunday evening.

Joe and Sarah were raising four children. Herman was their eldest; Katherine’s friendships brought Lena and Ina into the home; Boyd and Paul were still young boys. The Stillinger sisters had a family of their own waiting outside town. Their identities survive in names, photographs, church connections, and graves—not merely in theories about their deaths.

The murders remain compelling because the central question has no established answer. The house remains unsettling because it preserves the location of a real catastrophe. Its ghost stories may continue to evolve, but the historical responsibility is constant: distinguish evidence from accusation, folklore from fact, and the mystery of the killer from the lives of the eight people who were lost.

START READING KRIS CALVERT'S BOOKS TODAY FOR FREE

Sources used for this podcast:

Bazalgette, E. (Director). (2015). The woman who lived (Season 9, Episode 6) [TV series episode]. In Doctor Who. BBC Wales.Note: A complete APA television-episode reference also needs the writer and executive-producer credits.

Bowers, N. (2010, June). “Slay utterly”: Villisca axe murders 1912. Iowa Unsolved Murders: Historic Cases. https://iowaunsolvedmurders.com/the-murders/slay-utterly-villisca-axe-murders-1912/

CrimeReads. (2017, September 21). When the devil comes to town: Solving a bloody, 100-year-old axe murderer. https://crimereads.com/when-the-devil-comes-to-town-unmasking-a-100-year-old-axe-murderer/

The crime of the Villisca axe murder house [User-uploaded document]. (n.d.). Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/213971310/The-Crime-of-the-Villisca-Axe-Murder-House

Dash, M. (2012, June 8). The ax murderer who got away. Smithsonian Magazine. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-ax-murderer-who-got-away-117037374/

Ewing, J. (n.d.). The Villisca axe murders. Iowa Cold Cases. https://iowacoldcases.org/case-summaries/villisca-axe-murders/

FamilySearch. (n.d.-a). Joseph Thomas Stillinger (1860–1946). https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/9K6R-XLS/joseph-thomas-stillinger-1860-1946

FamilySearch. (n.d.-b). Josiah B Moore (1868–1912). https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/LR8M-VX7/josiah-b.-moore-1868-1912

FamilySearch. (n.d.-c). Lena Gertrude Stillinger (1900–1912). https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/9K6R-X2J/lena-gertrude-stillinger-1900-1912

Ferrall, S. (2006, June 7). Villisca axe murders, 1912 [Collection of newspaper transcriptions]. IAGenWeb. https://iagenweb.org/boards/montgomery/documents/index.cgi?read=114416

Find a Grave. (n.d.). John Henry Horton [Memorial]. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/87446554/john-henry-horton

Hushed Up History. (2016, January 24). The 1912 violence in Villisca. https://husheduphistory.com/post/137976413833/the-1912-violence-in-villisca

Inside the Villisca axe murder house: A paranormal investigation. (2015, April 13). HubPages. https://discover.hubpages.com/religion-philosophy/A-Paranormal-Investigation-Inside-the-Villisca-Ax-Murder-House

Iowa Legislature. (n.d.-a). Frank F. Jones. https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislators/legislator/legislatorALLYears?personID=3065

Iowa Legislature. (n.d.-b). Frank F. Jones: State senator. https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislators/legislator?ga=36&personID=3065

Iowa State Capitol Tour Guides. (2015, May 13). 1912 axe murders in Villisca remain unsolved [Historical newsletter]. Iowa Legislature. https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/publications/TB/663533.pdf

John Deere. (n.d.-a). Founder and president from 1837: John Deere. https://www.deere.com/en-us/our-company/explore-john-deere/history-heritage/john-deere

John Deere. (n.d.-b). History and heritage. https://www.deere.com/en-us/our-company/explore-john-deere/history-heritage

John Deere. (n.d.-c). The Plowshare (Issue 26). https://www.deere.ca/assets/pdfs/common/publications/plowshare_issue26.pdf

Josiah B. and Sara Moore House [National Register of Historic Places registration form]. (1997). National Park Service. https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/3c07fd01-1a5e-4e31-bade-1b6b255402a4

KETV. (2025, October 29). “If it’s haunted it happens”: KETV encounters the supernatural at the Villisca Axe Murder House. https://www.ketv.com/article/ketv-encounters-supernatural-villisca-axe-murder-house/69185005

My Dark Path. (n.d.). The Villisca axe murders. https://www.mydarkpath.com/the-villisca-axe-murders

National Inventors Hall of Fame. (n.d.). John Deere. https://www.invent.org/inductees/john-deere

National Park Service. (2021, April 14). Waterloo Boy tractor. https://www.nps.gov/places/000/waterloo-boy-tractor.htm

Notes from the Frontier. (2019, December 5). The axe-idental tourist: Part 2. https://www.notesfromthefrontier.com/post/the-axe-idental-tourist-part-2

Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). (n.d.). Villisca Presbyterian Church. https://pcusa.org/congregation/villisca-church-villisca-ia

Puzzle Box Horror. (2020, August 8). Unsolved axe murders lead to haunted house in Villisca, Iowa. https://puzzleboxhorror.com/urban-legends-unsolved-murders-haunted-house-villisca-iowa/

Radio Iowa. (2021, October 26). Book suggests suspect in Villisca ax murders was overlooked. https://www.radioiowa.com/2021/10/26/book-suggests-suspect-in-villisca-ax-murders-was-overlooked/

Robinson, P. A. (Director). (1989). Field of dreams [Film]. Universal Pictures.

Shelley, T. (2023, June 14). In 1913, “America’s Sherlock Holmes” investigated the origins of the malicious postcards sent to a wealthy Peoria landowner. WCBU. https://www.wcbu.org/local-news/2023-06-14/in-1913-americas-sherlock-holmes-investigated-the-origins-of-the-malicious-postcards-sent-to-a-wealthy-peoria-landowner

Smithsonian Institution. (n.d.). Waterloo Boy. https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/waterloo-boy:event-exhib-6435

True Crime Seven. (2019, July 19). Axe murderers—6 horrific true crime stories, 1 common tool. https://truecrimeseven.com/axe-murderers-6-horrific-true-crime-stories-1-common-tool/

United Press International. (2014, November 8). Paranormal enthusiast stabs himself at Iowa’s ax-murder house. https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2014/11/08/Paranormal-enthusiast-stabs-himself-at-Iowas-Ax-Murder-House/3071415451843/

US Ghost Adventures. (n.d.). Villisca axe murder house, Villisca, IA. https://usghostadventures.com/haunted-houses/villisca-axe-murder-house/

The Villisca axe murders. (2018, November 27). Identity and Belonging in Iowa. https://iowaidentitybelonging.sites.grinnell.edu/uncategorized/the-villisca-axe-murders/

Villisca axe murders: New book suggests Paul Mueller is responsible. (2017, December 8). The Des Moines Register. https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2017/12/08/villisca-axe-murders-iowa-bill-james-rachel-mccarthy-james-paul-mueller-man-train-book/934910001/

Villisca Axe Murder House. (n.d.-a). Contact us. https://murderhouse.com/contact/

Villisca Axe Murder House. (n.d.-b). The folklore. https://murderhouse.com/the-house-and-murders/the-folklore/

Villisca Axe Murder House. (n.d.-c). History. https://murderhouse.com/the-house-and-murders/history/

Villisca Axe Murder House. (n.d.-d). The murders. https://murderhouse.com/the-house-and-murders/the-murders/

Villisca Axe Murder House. (n.d.-e). The suspects. https://murderhouse.com/the-house-and-murders/suspects/

Why did a ghost hunter stab himself inside a famous ax-murder house? (2014, November 18). VICE. https://www.vice.com/en/article/why-did-a-ghost-hunter-stab-himself-inside-a-famous-axe-murder-house-1118/

WikiTree. (n.d.). Josiah B Moore (1868–1912). https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Moore-37990

Zemeckis, R. (Director). (1985). Back to the future [Film]. Universal Pictures.

Oscars. 2014). [Matthew McConaughey winning Best Actor | 86th Oscars [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wD2cVhC-63I

(1917, September 2). The New York Times https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1917/09/02/96264124.pdf

DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY

All information contained in this audio podcast or video presentation is provided for entertainment purposes only. The authors leave any and all conclusions to individual members of the audience. The author offers no statements of fact beyond those available through diligent private research or through information freely available in the public record. To the extent that pending or settled criminal matters or crime or possible crimes, are discussed in this audio podcast or video presentation, all parties or defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. To the extent that any pending or settled civil matters are discussed in this video presentation, all parties or defendants are presumed not liable unless proven liable in a court of law. Copyright for material incorporated and presented under Fair Use is retained by the original author or copyright holder where applicable. Our cases are researched using open source and archive materials, and the subjects are real crimes and people. We strive to produce each episode with respect to the victims, their families and loved ones. At Hitched 2 Homicide we are committed to always discussing how victims lived, and not just how they died. All podcast information is gleaned from sources given. All opinions in the podcast are solely of Hitched 2 Homicide and are for entertainment purposes only. All suspects are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Copyright & OwnershipThis podcast episode, including all audio, video, and written content, is the property of Hitched 2 Homicide and its creators, © 2026 Kris Calvert & Rob Pottorf of RP Music, Inc. All rights reserved.

Do not copy, reproduce, or distribute any part of this content without express written permission.For licensing, press inquiries, or collaboration requests, contact: kris@hitched2homicide.comFor more true crime episodes, visit: www.Hitched2Homicide.com Thanks for listening and remember… Southern charm won’t save you from true crime.