James Koedatich: The 1982 Murders of Amie Hoffman and Deirdre O'Brien; and the Psychic Who Claimed she Saw Them.
- Aug 5
- 16 min read
In the final weeks of 1982, two young women vanished from ordinary places along familiar New Jersey roads.
Eighteen-year-old Amie Hoffman disappeared after finishing a shift at a suburban shopping mall. Less than two weeks later, twenty-five-year-old Deirdre O’Brien was forced from the road, abducted, sexually assaulted, and stabbed.

The attacks sent fear through Morris County and the surrounding communities. Women began watching their rearview mirrors. Families waited anxiously for loved ones to arrive home. Investigators searched for a man who appeared able to seize women quickly, move them in his vehicle, and disappear before anyone understood what had happened.
“Amie was eighteen. Deirdre was twenty-five. Their lives should be remembered for far more than the man who ended them.”
Then a convicted murderer named James Koedatich reported a strange roadside attack of his own.
He claimed an unknown person had pulled him over and stabbed him in the back. Instead of directing police away from him, Koedatich’s story placed his car—and eventually Koedatich himself—at the center of the investigation.
But the case would acquire another, more unusual element. During the search for the killer, investigators spoke with New Jersey psychic Nancy Weber, who later claimed she had provided striking details about the murderer before he was identified.
Some investigators believed Weber had demonstrated an extraordinary ability. Skeptics argued that her predictions became more detailed only after Koedatich’s arrest.
More than forty years later, the murders of Amie Hoffman and Deirdre O’Brien remain a disturbing collision of predatory violence, forensic investigation, fallible memory, and the enduring human desire to believe that someone can see what others cannot.
Amie Hoffman
In November 1982, Amie Hoffman was an eighteen-year-old senior at Parsippany Hills High School. She was a cheerleader and worked part-time as a cashier at the Surprise Store inside the Morris County Mall.
On Tuesday, November 23, Amie attended school, went to cheerleading practice, and then reported for work at the mall.
At approximately 9:30 that night, she finished her shift and walked into the parking lot toward her car.
She never drove away.
Amie’s car was later found in the mall parking lot. Her belongings remained inside. There was no clear explanation for why she would have left voluntarily or where she might have gone.
The circumstances immediately suggested that something had happened between the store and her vehicle—a brief stretch of pavement that should have been entirely unremarkable.
Instead, it became the place where Amie Hoffman disappeared.
A Body in the Water
Two days later, on Thanksgiving Day, Amie’s body was discovered in a water-holding tank connected to a reservoir area in Randolph Township.
Investigators found blood on the sandy ground near the tank. A trail led toward the structure where her body was located.
Amie had been sexually assaulted and stabbed.
The discovery transformed a missing-person investigation into a homicide case and shattered any hope that she might still return home.
Police began interviewing people who had been near the mall on the night of November 23. Witnesses described a suspicious man and a vehicle seen in the area. Investigators developed composite images and collected whatever physical evidence the killer may have left behind.
The crime appeared to have required a vehicle. Amie had likely been abducted from the mall parking lot, transported elsewhere, attacked, and then left at the reservoir site.
But investigators did not yet have a name.
The Second Attack
On December 5, 1982—less than two weeks after Amie’s disappearance—twenty-five-year-old Deirdre O’Brien was driving to visit her parents.
According to the prosecution’s reconstruction, another vehicle forced Deirdre’s car from the road. She was abducted and taken to an isolated area near Interstate 80.
There, she was sexually assaulted and repeatedly stabbed.
Unlike Amie, Deirdre was still alive when she was discovered by a passing truck driver. She was transported for emergency treatment but died from her injuries before she could identify the man who had attacked her.
A tire impression was found near the location where Deirdre had been abducted. Investigators photographed the track, sketched it, and made a plaster cast.
Detective John Kinnecom of the Morris County Sheriff’s Division of Criminal Investigation began the painstaking process of comparing the impression against possible tires. Over the following weeks, he reportedly examined thousands of tread patterns.
The murders were similar enough to raise the possibility that one man had killed both women.
The area was now confronting what residents feared most: a predator moving along the roads of northern New Jersey.
A Community Living in Fear
The killings generated intense publicity throughout New Jersey and parts of Pennsylvania.
Newspapers reported on the statewide manhunt, the similarities between the attacks, and speculation that the two murders might be connected to other unsolved crimes. The coverage reflected the fear spreading across the region as women reported suspicious vehicles, attempted traffic stops, and encounters with drivers using flashing lights.
The possibility that a stranger could imitate a police officer was especially terrifying.
A flashing light usually meant authority. It meant a driver should slow down, pull over, and cooperate.
Now it might mean something else.
By mid-January 1983, no one had been arrested for either murder. James Koedatich was not publicly identified as a suspect in either case.
The Man Who Returned from Prison
James Jerold Koedatich was not a man without a history of violence.
Years earlier, in Florida, he had been convicted of murder and armed robbery. He received a twenty-year sentence and spent approximately eleven years in prison before his release in 1982.
During his incarceration, Koedatich killed another inmate. That death was ruled justifiable homicide, and he was not prosecuted for it.
Following his release, Koedatich returned to New Jersey.
Only a few months later, Amie Hoffman and Deirdre O’Brien were dead.
The public would eventually learn about Koedatich’s criminal history through extensive newspaper coverage following his arrest. That publicity later became an important issue in his appeals because his attorneys argued that it had made it impossible for him to receive a fair and impartial trial.
Nancy Weber Enters the Investigation
At some point during the investigation, police officers met with Nancy Weber, a self-described psychic who lived in New Jersey.
Accounts of precisely when that meeting took place and exactly what Weber said have varied over the years.
Weber later claimed that she received impressions about Amie’s killer. In her version of events, she provided investigators with remarkably specific information: the killer’s first name was James, his surname began with a K and had an Eastern European or Polish ending, he had committed murder in Florida, he had recently been released from prison, and he lived in the Morris County area.
She also reportedly described aspects of his family, his vehicle, and a future event in which the killer would present himself to police with a wound.
If all those details were provided before Koedatich’s identification, the reading would seem almost impossibly accurate.
Two detectives associated with the case, Jim Moore and Bill Hughes, later said they believed Weber had supplied information they found impressive. Their recollections helped transform the Koedatich investigation into one of the most frequently cited examples of a psychic allegedly assisting law enforcement.
Television programs later dramatized Weber’s involvement, sometimes suggesting that her visions led investigators directly to the killer.
The documented record is far less certain.
The Problem with the Psychic Timeline
Years after the murders, skeptical investigator Benjamin Radford examined the claims surrounding Nancy Weber.
He interviewed Moore and Hughes and found important disagreements between their memories.
Moore recalled that Weber provided information before Deirdre O’Brien was killed. Hughes believed the meeting may have occurred afterward. That disagreement matters because Weber reportedly warned that the killer would strike again.
If the warning came after Deirdre’s murder, it could not have predicted a second victim.
The detectives also did not fully confirm several of Weber’s most specific later claims. They recalled broader descriptions—such as Eastern European ancestry or imprisonment somewhere in the South—rather than the precise surname construction and Florida murder conviction Weber said she had identified.
No surviving contemporaneous notes clearly establish everything Weber said before Koedatich’s arrest. Moore reportedly discarded his old notes years later, Weber did not retain a detailed written record, and the original case documentation was unavailable for independent comparison.
That leaves the story dependent largely upon memories reconstructed after decades of interviews, documentaries, and repeated retellings.
There is another problem.
Weber claimed that she knew Amie had been stabbed even though the manner of death had not been released publicly. Newspaper accounts published immediately after Amie’s body was found, however, reported that she had suffered multiple stab wounds.
That does not prove Weber intentionally misrepresented what she knew. Human memory is not a recording. Over time, people can honestly remember later information as something they knew earlier.
But it does mean that the paranormal claims cannot be treated as firmly documented investigative fact.
James Koedatich Reports an Attack
On the night of January 16, 1983, police responded to a home on Harrison Street in Morristown.
They found thirty-four-year-old James Koedatich in the kitchen. His shirt was raised, and his mother was tending to a wound on his back.
Koedatich told officers that he had been driving on Route 24 when another vehicle approached with a flashing blue light. Believing he was being pulled over, he stopped.
According to Koedatich, the other driver then attacked and stabbed him.
The story was unsettling because it resembled reports connected to the O’Brien investigation. Deirdre had allegedly been forced from the road, and police had received other reports involving suspicious vehicles and flashing lights.
At that moment, however, officers treated Koedatich as the victim of an assault.
They arranged for him to be transported to Morristown Memorial Hospital. Following standard procedure, they secured his clothing and vehicle as potential evidence against the person he claimed had attacked him.
Koedatich appeared cooperative. He had voluntarily brought the police into the case.
That decision would destroy him.
The Tire That Changed Everything
Detective John Kinnecom was asked to examine Koedatich’s car because the supposed attack might be connected to the other roadside incidents.
When Kinnecom saw the tires on Koedatich’s 1970 Chevrolet, he immediately noticed a familiar tread pattern.
For weeks, he had been searching for a tire that resembled the impression recovered near Deirdre O’Brien’s car.
Now he was looking at one.
Kinnecom compared the tire with the sketch and photograph of the track from the O’Brien abduction site. The similarity was strong enough for investigators to obtain a search warrant.
Police removed the tire and transported Koedatich’s vehicle to the New Jersey State Police laboratory. The seat cover was taken out, the interior was vacuumed, and samples of the carpeting were collected. Materials were later submitted to the FBI laboratory for analysis.
A man who had presented himself as the victim of an attempted murder had delivered his car directly into the hands of detectives investigating two murders.
A Self-Inflicted Wound
Medical and investigative evidence indicated that the wound in Koedatich’s back was self-inflicted.
His story about being attacked by an unknown driver began to collapse.
Prosecutors argued that Koedatich had invented the incident to explain injuries connected to his crimes, create a fictional attacker, or direct investigators toward the idea that another roadside predator was operating in the area.
Instead, the false report drew attention to his car.
The New Jersey Supreme Court later described Koedatich as having “orchestrated the events” that led police to crucial evidence. He had initiated contact, pretended to cooperate, and encouraged officers to process his vehicle while believing they were searching for his assailant.
The court concluded that police had acted lawfully when they secured and examined the vehicle.
Koedatich’s attempt at deception had become the investigators’ greatest break.
The Physical Evidence
The cases against Koedatich relied heavily on circumstantial and forensic evidence.
In the O’Brien case, prosecutors presented the tire comparison, fibers, paint particles, and evidence that Koedatich’s wound had been self-inflicted. Later court summaries noted that paint particles found in his car corresponded with particles found on Deirdre’s clothing. The snow tire on his vehicle was also linked to the impression found near her abandoned car.
In Amie Hoffman’s case, FBI specialists compared material recovered from Koedatich’s Chevrolet with material found on Amie’s clothing and boots.
An FBI fiber examiner testified that nylon fibers on Amie’s boot were consistent with fibers from the car’s carpet. Polyester fibers on her skirt corresponded with fibers from the seat cover, while other nylon fibers were associated with the seat-cover binding.
A second specialist compared foam from the backing of Koedatich’s seat cover with pieces of foam found along the sole of Amie’s boot. He testified that the samples matched microscopically.
The defense challenged the significance of those comparisons. Its expert argued that many of the fibers were common and that the evidence could not conclusively establish that Amie had been inside Koedatich’s particular car.
The disagreement reflected the limits of fiber comparison. The evidence could establish consistency and correlation, but it did not offer the type of individualizing identification later associated with DNA testing.
Nevertheless, prosecutors presented the fibers and foam as part of a larger pattern that included witness descriptions, Koedatich’s vehicle, his behavior, and his fabricated stabbing story.
The Arrest
On January 19, 1983, police arrested James Koedatich for the murder of Deirdre O’Brien.
Charges in Amie Hoffman’s murder came later. Prosecutors said they were waiting for the forensic examination to be completed before moving forward.
On December 15, 1983, Koedatich was formally charged in Amie’s case with offenses that included purposeful or knowing murder, felony murder, kidnapping, aggravated sexual assault, and weapons violations.
The state elected to try the cases separately.
Although Koedatich was first indicted in Deirdre’s murder, the Amie Hoffman trial proceeded first.
The Trial for Amie Hoffman’s Murder
Koedatich’s trial in Amie’s case began in October 1984. The prosecution constructed its case around four central areas: Amie’s disappearance and the discovery of her body. Her activities before the abduction. Witness descriptions of Koedatich and his vehicle.
The fiber and foam evidence connecting Amie’s clothing to the inside of his car.
The defense argued that Koedatich did not match some witness descriptions, that the physical evidence was not unique, and that he had been home playing video games when Amie disappeared.
His attorneys also attempted to point suspicion toward another man associated with Amie’s school. The trial court allowed limited evidence suggesting that another vehicle may have been near the reservoir but found that much of the defense theory created suspicion without directly connecting the alternative suspect to Amie’s abduction or murder.
The jury convicted Koedatich.
He was sentenced to death.
He was later convicted of murdering Deirdre O’Brien and received a life sentence in that case.
Publicity and Appeals
The trials unfolded under extraordinary public scrutiny.
Newspapers had extensively reported Koedatich’s prior Florida murder conviction, the death of another inmate, the details of Amie’s and Deirdre’s killings, and the theory that a serial killer had been stalking local roads.
Koedatich’s attorneys repeatedly requested a change of venue, arguing that the publicity had contaminated the potential jury pool.
The New Jersey Supreme Court ultimately affirmed his conviction for Amie’s murder in 1988. The majority concluded that the trial court had taken sufficient steps to select an impartial jury and that Koedatich had not demonstrated that the verdict was improperly influenced by outside information.
The decision was not unanimous in its assessment of the trial’s fairness. A dissenting opinion argued that the publicity, prosecutorial conduct, and weakness of portions of the evidence undermined confidence in the proceedings.
Although the murder conviction survived, Koedatich’s death sentence did not.
The court determined that the jury had been improperly instructed during the penalty phase, particularly regarding the consideration of mitigating circumstances. His death sentence was vacated, and the case was returned for a new sentencing proceeding.
In 1990, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued another decision addressing what aggravating evidence prosecutors could present during resentencing.
Koedatich was eventually sentenced to life imprisonment rather than death.
Did Nancy Weber Help Catch James Koedatich?
The honest answer depends upon what is meant by “help.”
Police officers did meet with Nancy Weber. At least two detectives later said that they believed some of her impressions were remarkable.
But there is no reliable evidence that her information identified Koedatich, produced the search warrant, or directly caused his arrest.
Koedatich came under serious suspicion because he reported a suspicious stabbing, voluntarily surrendered access to his vehicle, possessed a tire resembling the impression from the O’Brien crime scene, and carried physical evidence in his car that investigators associated with both victims.
That is the documented investigative chain.
The tire did not require clairvoyance.
The fibers did not require a vision.
The self-inflicted wound did not require a supernatural explanation.
Weber’s role remains fascinating because it sits at the intersection of belief and memory. Investigators facing a horrifying case may have been open to information from any possible source. Years later, when several broad impressions seemed to correspond with Koedatich, those similarities may have appeared more specific and more predictive than they originally were.
Repeated television retellings strengthened the mythology. A complicated investigation became a cleaner story: a psychic saw a killer, warned the police, and predicted the mistake that would expose him.
Reality rarely arrives in such a perfect narrative.
Remembering Amie and Deirdre
The debate over Nancy Weber should never eclipse the two women at the center of the case.
Amie Hoffman was eighteen years old. She was a student, a cheerleader, an employee, a daughter, and a friend. She walked from her workplace toward her car and encountered a man who decided that her life belonged to him.
Deirdre O’Brien was twenty-five. She was driving to see her family when she was forced from the road. She survived long enough to be found, but not long enough to tell investigators who had attacked her.
Their deaths became linked through evidence, geography, and the violence of one man.
The most compelling lesson in their case is not that a psychic may have seen through the eyes of a killer. It is that James Koedatich believed he could manipulate the investigation. He constructed a false attack, created a fictional assailant, and invited police to examine the very vehicle that connected him to his victims.
He tried to control the story.
Instead, he handed investigators the evidence they needed to end it.
Amie Hoffman and Deirdre O’Brien were not characters in a paranormal mystery. They were young women whose futures were stolen.
Whatever one believes about psychic phenomena, justice in this case was built in the physical world—through a tire track pressed into the earth, microscopic material carried inside a car, a wound that told a different story from the man who wore it, and investigators who recognized that the supposed victim standing before them might actually be the killer they had been hunting.

Sources used for this podcast and youtube:
Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). James Koedatich. Wikipedia. Retrieved August 4, 2026, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Koedatich
Supreme Court of New Jersey. (1988). State v. Koedatich, 112 N.J. 225. Justia US Law. https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1988/112-n-j-225-1.html
Parolee arrested in murder case in Morris County. (1983, January 19). The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/19/nyregion/parolee-arrested-in-murder-case-in-morris-county.html
Bizarre stabbing incident helped police crack case of slain high school cheerleader. (2023, July 20). CrimeFeed, Investigation Discovery. https://www.investigationdiscovery.com/crimefeed/murder/bizarre-stabbing-incident-helped-police-crack-case-of-slain-high-school-cheerleader-woman
Death penalty ordered by jury for Jersey man. (1984, October 30). The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1984/10/30/nyregion/death-penalty-ordered-by-jury-for-jersey-man.html
A Morris County jury granted convicted murderer James Koedatich his wish. (1984, October 29). UPI. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/10/29/A-Morris-County-jury-granted-convicted-murderer-James-Koedatich/2313467874000/
Judge approves convicted killer's request to test DNA 36 years after murders. (2018, July 16). NorthJersey.com / Daily Record. https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/morris/2018/07/16/convicted-nj-killer-wants-dna-tested-36-years-after-womens-murders/789085002/
State v. Koedatich (1988) – Case analysis. (n.d.). Callidus AI. Retrieved August 4, 2026, from https://callidusai.com/wp/ai/cases/2159212/state-v-koedatich
Supreme Court of New Jersey. (1990). State v. Koedatich, 118 N.J. 513. Justia US Law. https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1990/118-n-j-513-1.html
State v. Loftin [Case summary]. (n.d.). Casemine. Retrieved August 4, 2026, from https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914bb4dadd7b04934795ecd
Former Morris man fought for victims' rights. (2014, December 31). New Jersey Herald. https://www.njherald.com/story/news/2014/12/31/former-morris-man-fought-for/4038359007/
Justia. (n.d.). State v. Koedatich. https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1988/112-n-j-225-1.html [youtube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8bFsETko94)
VLEX. (n.d.). State v. Koedatich. https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/state-v-koedatich-895407494 [youtube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVgnpaJnET8)
Wikipedia contributors. (2021, December 6). James Koedatich. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Koedatich [en.wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Koedatich)
The New York Times. (1982, November 26). Missing Jersey cheerleader is found stabbed to death. https://www.nytimes.com/1982/11/26/nyregion/missing-jersey-cheerleader-is-found-stabbed-to-death.html [nytimes](https://www.nytimes.com/1982/11/26/nyregion/missing-jersey-cheerleader-is-found-stabbed-to-death.html)
The New York Times. (1982, December 7). Jersey woman, 25, seized in car and fatally stabbed at Route 80. https://www.nytimes.com/1982/12/07/nyregion/jersey-woman-25-seized-in-car-and-fatally-stabbed-at-route-80.html [dailyrecord](https://www.dailyrecord.com/story/news/crime/morris-county/2017/11/28/man-convicted-killing-two-morris-county-women-asks-1982-dna-tested/899758001/)
The New York Times. (1983, January 19). Parolee arrested in murder case in Morris County. https://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/19/nyregion/parolee-arrested-in-murder-case-in-morris-county.html [facebook](https://www.facebook.com/TheNewDetectives/videos/the-horrific-crime-deirdre-obrien-faced/1325664436318865/)
UPI Archives. (1983, January 18). A man who called police and claimed he was... https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/01/18/A-man-who-called-police-and-claimed-he-was/6035411714000/ [instagram](https://www.instagram.com/reel/Czlg4UUscg4/)
Skeptical Inquirer. (2010). The psychic and the serial killer. https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2010/03/p32.pdf [youtube](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_ADbML2q5zk)
Daily Record. (2018, October 2). Convicted 1982 Morris County killer James Koedatich wants Innocence Project’s help. https://www.dailyrecord.com/story/news/2018/10/02/convicted-1982-morris-county-killer-james-koedatich-wants-innocence-projects-h... [dailyrecord](https://www.dailyrecord.com/story/news/2018/10/02/convicted-1982-morris-county-killer-james-koedatich-wants-innocence-projects-help-dna/1496340002/)
NorthJersey.com. (2018, July 16). Convicted NJ killer wants DNA tested 36 years after women’s murders. https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/morris/2018/07/16/convicted-nj-killer-wants-dna-tested-36-years-after-womens-murders/7890... [facebook](https://www.facebook.com/northjerseycom/posts/convicted-killer-james-j-koedatich-wants-his-dna-tested-to-prove-he-did-not-rape/10155307324962523/)
News 12. (2023, November 12). He hunted the women: How a psychic helped stop serial killer James Koedatich. https://bronx.news12.com/2023/11/13/he-hunted-the-women-how-a-psychic-helped-stop-serial-killer-james-koedatich/2TWjYSgNc7TRB3fF... [crimejunkiepodcast](https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/murdered-amie-hoffman-deirdre-obrien/)
Patrus, A.T. (1971, June 14). Police Find Corpse in closet The Miami Herald https://www.newspapers.com/image/623880977/
Staff (1971 June 23). Milk Truck Driver Robbed]. Tampa Bay Times https://www.newspapers.com/image/317587960/
Staff (1971, October, 10). Jail Escapee Gets 20-Year Term. The Miami Herald https://www.newspapers.com/image/625422318/
Starke (AP) (1973, Sept 6). Prisoner Killed in Cell Fight. The Florida Times-Union https://www.newspapers.com/image/1262189747/
Staff (UPI). (1964, Feb 28) Two Escapees Give up After Police Battle The News of Cumberland County. https://www.newspapers.com/image/1083916790/
Staff (UPI) (1964, Feb 28). Lead-Slinging Lads Back in Annandale. The Record. https://www.newspapers.com/image/491140534/
Staff (1969, May 21). Man Acquitted of Assault, Guilty of Lesser Charge. The Central New Jersey Home News. https://www.newspapers.com/image/316085960/
Lally R. (1984, Sep 23). Morris Murder Suspect blames arrest record. Daily Record. https://www.newspapers.com/image/254674317/
Radford, B. (2010). The psychic and the serial killer. Skeptical Inquirer. https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2010/03/p32.pdf
Find A Grave. (n.d.). Amie L. Hoffman (1964–1982) [Memorial]. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/117542289/amie-l-hoffman
Cowen, R. (2017, November 28). Man convicted of 2 murders in 1982 seeks DNA test. NJ.com. https://www.nj.com/morris/2017/11/man_convicted_of_2_murders_in_1982_seeks_dna_test.html
News 12. (2023, November 13). He hunted the women: How a psychic helped stop serial killer James Koedatich [Video & article]. Bronx News 12. https://bronx.news12.com/2023/11/13/he-hunted-the-women-how-a-psychic-helped-stop-serial-killer-james-koedatich/2TWjYSgNc7TRB3fF2fsaz0
Annandale Village. (n.d.). Reformatory [Web page]. https://www.annandalevillage.com/gallery/reformatory.html
Florida Memory. (n.d.). [Item related to James Koedatich / Florida case]. State Archives of Florida. https://www.floridamemory.com/items/show/137110
Deirdre’s House. (n.d.). Home [Organization website]. https://www.deirdreshouse.org/
Facebook group post (2025, Month Day). [Post about James Koedatich / case discussion] [Facebook group post]. https://www.facebook.com/groups/125409904217878/posts/6739267966165339/
BadPsychics. (2007, January). Nancy Orlen Weber: Experience with cold reading [Blog post]. https://www.badpsychics.com/2007/01/nancy-orlen-weber-experience-with-cold.html
Parker, T. (Writer), & Smith, E. (Director). (2018). Nobody Got Cereal (Season 22, Episode 7) [TV series episode]. In T. Parker & M. Stone (Creators), South Park. Comedy Central.
Parker, T. (Writer), & Stone, M. (Director). (2000). Cartman’s Silly Hate Crime 2000 (Season 4, Episode 2) [TV series episode]. In T. Parker & M. Stone (Creators), South Park. Comedy Central.
Zemeckis, R. (Director). (1994). Forrest Gump [Film]. Paramount Pictures.
DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY
All information contained in this audio podcast or video presentation is provided for entertainment purposes only. The authors leave any and all conclusions to individual members of the audience. The author offers no statements of fact beyond those available through diligent private research or through information freely available in the public record. To the extent that pending or settled criminal matters or crime or possible crimes, are discussed in this audio podcast or video presentation, all parties or defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. To the extent that any pending or settled civil matters are discussed in this video presentation, all parties or defendants are presumed not liable unless proven liable in a court of law. Copyright for material incorporated and presented under Fair Use is retained by the original author or copyright holder where applicable. Our cases are researched using open source and archive materials, and the subjects are real crimes and people. We strive to produce each episode with respect to the victims, their families and loved ones. At Hitched 2 Homicide we are committed to always discussing how victims lived, and not just how they died. All podcast information is gleaned from sources given. All opinions in the podcast are solely of Hitched 2 Homicide and are for entertainment purposes only. All suspects are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Copyright & OwnershipThis podcast episode, including all audio, video, and written content, is the property of Hitched 2 Homicide and its creators, © 2025 Kris Calvert & Rob Pottorf of RP Music, Inc. All rights reserved.
Do not copy, reproduce, or distribute any part of this content without express written permission.For licensing, press inquiries, or collaboration requests, contact: kris@hitched2homicide.comFor more true crime episodes, visit: www.Hitched2Homicide.com Thanks for listening and remember… Southern charm won’t save you from true crime.
THIS PODCAST IS FILMED AT RP STUDIOS, INC.© 2025 RP MUSIC, INC. FOR HITCHED 2 HOMICIDE
Follow H2H Join H2H In-laws and Outlaws: https://www.facebook.com/groups/h2hinlawsandoutlaws
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hitched2homicide/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/H2H_Podcast
Follow and Read Books by Kris Calvert:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kriscalvertauthor/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kriscalvert30
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kriscalvert
Follow and Listen to Music by Rob Pottorf
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/robpottorfmusic/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RobPottorfMusic
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RobPottorfMusic
Follow Scottie on Instagram 🐶: https://www.instagram.com/scottietotherescue/
On the go? Listen to Hitched 2 Homicide on all major podcast platforms
Apple: https://apple.co/3J0mv1t
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2T1TU4J
Google: https://bit.ly/H2H_Podcast
Amazon: https://amzn.to/3NMFm2y
Stitcher: https://bit.ly/H2H_Sticher
Pandora: https://bit.ly/H2H_Pandora
iHeart Radio: https://ihr.fm/2ySzLah
Tune in Alexa: https://bit.ly/Alexa_H2H
Listen on @applepodcasts or watch on @YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@hitched2homicidepodcast



Comments